We use cookies on this site, but we don't capture any personal information. View cookie options.

What happens if you decline cookies?

Like most people, I use Google Analytics to see how my web site is used, but this doesn't capture any personal information about you, and I certainly don't gather data about you in any other way without telling you. There's no hidden market intelligence stuff on the site. But you can decline cookies if you really want to, and I'll suppress Google Analytics.

Please state your preference below.
(Clicking 'Accept cookies' gets rid of that annoying top bar.)

My site also uses essential cookies, which are permitted under UK law. You can override them in your browser settings, but the site probably won't work properly if you do.
For more information, see my Privacy policy page.

Current status:

Accept cookies     Decline cookies      Reset     Close




 

Me went to the shops

Spot the faults in these sentences:

“Me and Sarah went to the shops.”

“The sales person served Sarah and I.”

“Between you and I, this lecturing about grammar sucks.”

Answer:

“I” is a nominative pronoun. It does things; it can’t be the object of a verb.

“Me” is an accusative pronoun. It has things done to it; it can’t be the subject.

“Sarah and I went to the shops.”

“The sales person served Sarah and ME.”

“Between you and ME, this is really helpful!”

Reality check:

Everyone uses “me” as the subject of sentences now. It’s universal and apparently unstoppable. It started as a slightly jocular twist on proper grammar, and is sometimes also a ruse for putting the speaker at the start of a statement. You wouldn’t say, “I and Sarah went out,” so people say, “Me and Sarah went out” instead. It’s still wrong, but doesn’t sound quite so awful. That being said, why can’t people be polite enough to put Sarah first? What’s wrong with “Sarah and I went out”?

I is a different case (or should that be “I are different case”?)

I think “Give it to Sarah and I” originated with people half-remembering a rule they learned in childhood, but not remembering it right. Unfortunately, it’s heard so often now that people are beginning to think it is the rule.

It’s not.

So does it matter?

The risk is that constant misuse entrenches mistakes. Remember the word “invitation”? People started saying “invite” for short, and now those who don’t remember the real word use “invite” even in formal writing. Yet it’s ugly. Can you imagine receiving a card that says, “This is a formal invite to a royal garden party”? Maybe you can. I can’t!

Just ask yourself …

Would you say, “Me went to the shops”? Would you say “Let I give you a hand with that”?

No you wouldn’t.

 

Author’s note

As you can see, I’m an unrepentant lifelong pedant, but insistence on correctness has helped me immeasurably with my writing, and I can’t be so different from everyone else. So I’ve decided to share a few insights here in a vainglorious attempt to make the world a more comprehensible place.

If you’d like to suggest any other grammatical howlers that I could expose, please leave a comment or drop me a note here. I’d love to hear from you.

And you can decide for yourself whether I live up to my own tenets by checking out my novels. See peterrowlands.com.

  
Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Fancy a grammar rant?

Enjoy a grumble about the unwitting mistakes people make in speech and writing? 
See Writer’s rant page.

Main blog topics

More posts

 

Past posts

 

© Peter Rowlands 2026

 

 

Peter Rowlands on Facebook Peter Rowlands on Twitter

About me

Contact me

 

 

Sitemap

Reset cookies

 

© Peter Rowlands 2026

 

 

 

 

Peter Rowlands on Facebook Peter Rowlands on Twitter

 

About me

Contact me

 

 

 

Sitemap

Reset cookies