We use cookies on this site, but we don't capture any personal information. View cookie options.

What happens if you decline cookies?

Like most people, I use Google Analytics to see how my web site is used, but this doesn't capture any personal information about you, and I certainly don't gather data about you in any other way without telling you. There's no hidden market intelligence stuff on the site. But you can decline cookies if you really want to, and I'll suppress Google Analytics.

Please state your preference below.
(Clicking 'Accept cookies' gets rid of that annoying top bar.)

My site also uses essential cookies, which are permitted under UK law. You can override them in your browser settings, but the site probably won't work properly if you do.
For more information, see my Privacy policy page.

Current status:

Accept cookies     Decline cookies      Reset     Close




 

Both … but also

Spot the fault in this sentence:

“She bought both the yellow dress but also the red pullover.”

Answer:

“Both” should always be followed by “and”, never “but”.

“She bought both the yellow dress AND the red pullover.”

The problem:

People are confusing two different expressions:
“Both … AND …”
“Not only … BUT also …”

What’s going on?

It’s a familiar problem. People are losing faith in the power of language. They think “both … and …” sounds weak. They want to emphasise the “and” part of their statement, so they preface it with “but” instead. Politicians are particularly prone to doing this during interviews. They’re mangling language in their desperation to sound strong and impactful.

Collapse of logic

“Both … but …” is a collapse of logic. It’s a bit like what happens with the the push-puppet I’ve illustrated above. You press your thumb on the button underneath and everything falls apart. In speech and writing, what falls apart is comprehensibility.

Why this is wrong

“Both” is a coupling word, connecting two statements or propositions. The only link word that can follow it is “and”. The “and” part of the statement has no logical impact on the initial “both” part. Each exists on its own.

“But” is negating word. It contradicts whatever has come before it, or qualifies it by introducing a new thought that may change the overall thrust of the sentence. It looks both forward and back.

Connecting “both” with “but” reduces the sentence to a logical impossibility. It’s like trying to imagine a car that is driving both ways at the same time.

The solution

Easy! Either say, “She bought BOTH the yellow dress AND the red pullover,” or say, “She bought NOT ONLY the yellow dress, BUT ALSO the red pullover.”

Just ask yourself …

Would you say, “I’ll have EITHER this dress AND that pullover.” Of course you wouldn’t. So don’t say, “Both … but …”

 

Author’s note

As you can see, I’m an unrepentant lifelong pedant, but insistence on correctness has helped me immeasurably with my writing, and I can’t be so different from everyone else. So I’ve decided to share a few insights here in a vainglorious attempt to make the world a more comprehensible place.

If you’d like to suggest any other grammatical howlers that I could expose, please leave a comment or drop me a note here. I’d love to hear from you.

And you can decide for yourself whether I live up to my own tenets by checking out my novels. See peterrowlands.com.

 

  
Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Leave a comment

Leave a reply

Your email address won't be published.  
Replies from new contributors are displayed once approved.

 

Welcome to my blog!

Commentary on writing, self-publishing, books, and the wider world.

Writer’s rant

Fancy reading a grumble about the unwitting mistakes people make in speech and writing? See 
Writer’s Rant page.

Main blog topics

More posts

 

Past posts

 

© Peter Rowlands 2026

 

 

Peter Rowlands on Facebook Peter Rowlands on Twitter

About me

Contact me

 

 

Sitemap

Reset cookies

 

© Peter Rowlands 2026

 

 

 

 

Peter Rowlands on Facebook Peter Rowlands on Twitter

 

About me

Contact me

 

 

 

Sitemap

Reset cookies